Home > Opinion > Editorials

Crackdown on fake news must not become a pre-election gag order

Published: 27 Feb. 2026, 00:00

Prime Minister Kim Min-seok, left, speaks during a ministerial meeting on countermeasures against fake news, including the misuse of artificial intelligence, at the Government Complex Seoul in Jongno District, central Seoul, on Feb. 26. [YONHAP]

Prime Minister Kim Min-seok said Thursday that the government will respond strictly to fake news in accordance with the law and seek to eradicate it at its source. At a ministerial meeting on countermeasures, he said the Korea Media and Communications Commission will serve as the coordinating body, with multiple ministries as well as prosecutors and police participating.

Kim described fake news and smear campaigns that distort government policy, defame public officials or attack specific candidates and parties ahead of elections as “a public enemy of democracy.” The spread of politically motivated misinformation has long been a social problem, fueled by highly polarized politics and profit-driven content creators. The use of artificial intelligence, including deepfakes that fabricate images or statements, has further increased the risk of reputational damage and illicit gains.

Such practices clearly deserve firm action. However, with the June 3 local elections approaching, concerns are growing that labeling criticism of government policy as fake news could lead to excessive opinion control and undermine freedom of expression.

In a democratic society, it is natural for citizens to express support or opposition to government policies during an election period. If authorities focus enforcement primarily on voices critical of those in power, warning of punishment for “policy distortion” or “false defamation,” even legitimate public debate could be discouraged. The result could be a chilling effect that distorts public sentiment rather than protecting it.

The ruling Democratic Party has also drawn criticism over legislative moves related to election speech. A proposed revision to the Referendum Act includes a provision criminalizing interference with the freedom of voting, raising concerns that the National Election Commission could be granted excessive authority.

In addition, the National Assembly passed an amendment to the Information and Communications Network Act late last December that allows punitive damages of up to five times the actual loss for the distribution of false or manipulated information. Despite constitutional concerns raised by legal experts, the law is scheduled to take effect at the end of June, after the local elections.

The government and the ruling party should guard against the temptation to use administrative power and legislation to shape public opinion in their favor. Efforts to combat misinformation must be balanced with safeguards for open debate.

Ultimately, public trust is best secured when those in power demonstrate a clear commitment to protecting freedom of expression as guaranteed by the Constitution. A crackdown that suppresses dissent risks weakening democratic legitimacy rather than strengthening it.

This article was originally written in Korean and translated by a bilingual reporter with the help of generative AI tools. It was then edited by a native English-speaking editor. All AI-assisted translations are reviewed and refined by our newsroom.