DMZ mine blast puts Lee's approach to North Korea to the test

After a mine maimed South Korean soldiers in 2015, tensions were ratcheted up before easing through dialogue. The president's more dovish policy doesn't align with brinkmanship.

Published Modified
박근혜 전 대통령이 2015년 8월 6일 오후 국군수도병원을 방문해 DMZ 지뢰도발로 인해 부상을 당한 김정원 하사를 격려하고 있다
Then-President Park Geun-hye, left, comforts Army Staff Sgt. Kim Jung-won after he was injured by a North Korean mine, at the Armed Forces Capital Hospital in Gyeonggi on Aug. 6, 2015.

In 2015, South Korea answered a North Korean mine attack with loudspeakers and pressure. Eleven years later, another blast in the demilitarized zone (DMZ) has left Seoul with a much harder choice.

When Seoul concluded that Pyongyang was behind the 2015 wooden-box mine incident, it responded immediately by cranking loudspeaker broadcasts against the North again. The blast cost one South Korean soldier both legs and another soldier his right leg.

Back then, the South Korean government was able to raise pressure on the North before finding an exit through talks at Panmunjom. Under the Lee Jae Myung administration, however, loudspeakers have been dismantled, and Pyongyang refuses to communicate with Seoul.

With the South casting itself as a “pacemaker” for renewed dialogue between North Korea and the United States, its ability to respond to Pyongyang without abandoning its push for dialogue is now being tested.

"Based on our overall assessment of the field investigation so far, we believe it is highly likely that a North Korean military mine caused the explosion," Lt. Gen. Kwon Dae-won, the vice chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, said during a press briefing at the Ministry of National Defense headquarters in Yongsan District, central Seoul, on Monday. “If the final investigation determines that our troops were injured by a mine planted by North Korean forces, our military will take appropriate and corresponding measures.”

After the incident in 2015, the Park Geun-hye administration moved quickly. On Aug. 10, six days after the incident, the South Korean government concluded that North Korea had deliberately planted the wooden-box mines. Investigators cited the concentration of mines near a gate frequently used by South Korean troops and the low likelihood that the mines had washed into the area.

Loudspeaker broadcasts toward North Korea resumed that same day for the first time since 2004.

2015년 8월에 열린 마지막 남북 고위급 접촉 (서울=연합뉴스) 정부가 17일 남북군사당국 회담과 이산가족 상봉을 위한 남북 적십자 회담을 17일 제의했다. 북한이 이에 응한다면 2015년 12월 남북 차관급 회담 이후 1년 7개월여만의 남북 당국회담이 성사되는 것이다. 사진은 2015년 8월 25일 북한 목함지뢰 도발로 인한 남북 긴장 해결을 위해 판문점에서 열렸던 남북 고위급 접촉 당시의 모습. (왼쪽부터) 당시 회담에 참석했던 북측 김양건 노동당 당비서, 남측 김관진 국가안보실장, 북측 황병서 군 총정치국장, 남측 홍용표 전 통일부 장관. 2017.7.17 [연합뉴스 자료사진] photo@yna.co.kr/2017-07-17 09:10:18/
South and North Korean officials pose during high-level talks at Panmunjom on Aug. 25, 2015.

Tensions peaked 10 days later after North Korea fired artillery and South Korean forces returned fire. After 43 hours of high-level talks at Panmunjom on Aug. 25, however, the two sides reached an agreement. North Korea expressed regret over the mine explosions and South Korea agreed to suspend the loudspeaker broadcasts as long as no “abnormal situation” occurred.

The situation is different this time.

The Lee administration suspended loudspeaker broadcasts toward North Korea shortly after taking office in June of last year and removed all 20 or so fixed loudspeakers from front line areas in August. The South Korean government described the moves as steps to ease inter-Korean tensions.

(서울=뉴스1) 김진환 기자 = 권대원 합동참모본부 차장이 28일 서울 용산구 국방부 브리핑실에서 DMZ 지뢰 추정 폭발 상황 관련 중간 조사 브리핑을 하고 있다. 2026.9.28/뉴스1
Lt. Gen. Kwon Dae-won, the vice chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, briefs reporters on the suspected land mine explosion in the demilitarized zone at the Ministry of National Defense in Yongsan District, central Seoul, on Sept. 28.

Reinstalling the speakers would therefore mean more than simply putting military equipment back in place. It would also signal a reversal of the administration’s approach toward North Korea.

“The first thing we should do is reinstall the loudspeakers that were removed,” Rep. Ahn Cheol-soo of the main opposition People Power Party said.

Some within and outside the military, however, find the move would be difficult to pursue immediately.

Instead, some military officials have reportedly discussed expanding patrols and mine detection and removal operations in parts of the DMZ where North Korean mines have been identified under the rationale that such a move would prevent further injuries to troops, while the risk of raising military tensions between the two Koreas would be relatively lower than reinstalling the loudspeakers.

Another difference from 2015 is the absence of a direct communication channel between the two countries.

Back then, North Korea was the one that proposed high-level talks. Now, even that channel is gone: Since April 2023, Pyongyang has stopped answering regular calls through the inter-Korean liaison office and military communication lines.

이재명 대통령과 트럼프 대통령 (뉴욕=연합뉴스) 한상균 기자 = 유엔 총회 참석차 미국을 방문 중인 이재명 대통령이 22일(현지시간) 뉴욕 한 호텔에서 도널드 트럼프 미국 대통령과 정상회담을 하고 있다. 2026.9.23 [공동취재 제공. 재판매 및 DB 금지] xyz@yna.co.kr/2026-09-23 11:20:41/
President Lee Jae Myung, left, speaks with U.S. President Donald Trump in New York on Sept. 22.

That leaves the United Nations Command Military Armistice Commission as essentially the only formal channel through which the South Korean government can raise the issue as a possible violation of the Armistice Agreement.

The timing also adds to the South Korean government’s dilemma because Seoul is seeking to revive dialogue between North Korea and the United States.

“I hope the long-suspended dialogue between North Korea and the U.S. can resume without delay. We will lay the groundwork for this to develop into a dialogue among the parties aimed at ending the war on the Korean Peninsula and transitioning to a peace regime,” Lee said at the United Nations General Assembly on Sept. 22.

“In 2015, the two sides traded tough responses, but how far things go this time will also be influenced by the current government’s approach toward North Korea,” a former senior military official familiar with the 2015 incident said.

BY YOON JI-WON, LEE YU-JUNG, SHIM SEOK-YONG [[email protected]]

This article was originally written in Korean and translated by a bilingual reporter with the help of generative AI tools. It was then edited by a native English-speaking editor. All AI-assisted translations are reviewed and refined by our newsroom.